Error Require() Of Es Modules Is Not Supported When Importing Node-Fetch

require()

const fetch = require('node-fetch');

import keyword to import the Node-Fetch module. Here's an example:

import fetch from 'node-fetch';


This code aligns with ES6 standards and will import the Node-Fetch function appropriately without throwing errors.
However, if you prefer to stick with 

require()

, attaching '.default' to the end of 

require()

 would solve the issue:

const fetch = require('node-fetch').default;


In this case, .default is the exported object from a module in ES6 module system that we can conveniently access using commonjs.
Therefore, comprehending these distinctive aspects of JavaScript's modularity allows us to effectively mitigate errors such as "Require() of ES modules is not supported". As Jamie Kyle, a notable JavaScript developer observed - "Understanding your tools means better productivity, less frustration and more quality output." 
To simplify things further, developers can consider using tools like Babel or TypeScript which handle module compatibility issues providing consistent syntax norms between client and server-side rendering.
It's important to keep abreast of evolving coding standards to ensure old and new techniques coexist harmoniously, to minimize interruptions during application development.


Table of Contents
Toggle

Understanding Why Require() of ES Modules Isn't Supported while Importing Node-Fetch

The error "require() of ES modules is not supported" usually comes up when you're trying to import an ES Module using the require() function in Node.js. This scenario applies to the 

node-fetch

 package, which can give rise to such an issue.
Diving deeper into ES Modules and CommonJS in Node.js:
Primarily, JavaScript modules come in two main types: 
CommonJS, predominantly used in Node.js which utilizes the

require()

 function for module loading.
ESModules (ESM), the standard for JavaScript modules in the broader ecosystem which uses the

import/export

 syntax.
Node.js primarily functions on CommonJS, but it also provides support for ES modules. However, importing an ESM package via the 

require()

 function is not endorsed. Whereas 

node-fetch

 is an ES module, errors arise if we try importing it using 

require()

.
Solving "require() of ES modules is not supported" error in Node-fetch:
To fix this, you can use dynamic 

import()

 statements or convert your application to use ESM syntax.
Using Dynamic 

import()

:


const fetch = (...args) => import('node-fetch').then(({default: fetch}) => fetch(...args));



Converting to ESM Syntax:
Note: You will need to set proper file extensions (.mjs) or add "type": "module" in your package.json for it to work correctly.


import fetch from 'node-fetch';



As Douglas Crockford, a JavaScript developer well known for his work on JSON data format, once said, "Programming is not about typing, it's about thinking". These solutions provided are aimed to inject more understanding rather than being quick fixes. Deep comprehension of the underlying JavaScript module systems will substantially benefit when encountering related scenarios in your coding journey.
More information on ES modules in Node.js can be found in this official Node.js documentation.
Investigating Common Issues and Solutions for Node-Fetch Imports Failures

When delving into the commonly faced issues surrounding the importation of Node-fetch in JavaScript, it is vital to emphasize that one of the recurrent challenges is associated with the "Error Require() of ES Modules is not supported". 
Why does this error occur? JavaScript has hitherto been impeded by its lack of a standard module system which, when conjoined with its independent peripheral environment compatibility requirements, engenders a complicated ecosystems of script loading solutions. Over time, the community consolidated around CommonJS modules (as used by `Node.js`) and ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) modules. The key discrepancy between these two pertains to when they execute their imports - ES6 executes at compile-time while CommonJS modules execute at runtime.
The error under scrutiny here arises when developers iterate from the traditional `require` syntax intrinsic to CommonJS towards ES6 modules, via utilisation of the `import` syntax. If you're keen to leverage ES6 modules whilst using Node.js (or any derivative technologies), it's crucial to comprehend that ES6 and CommonJS manage modules differently. Easy slip-ups or misunderstanding can lead to errors like `Error: require() of ES modules is not supported`.
Overcoming the Error
An immediate solution that might emerge would be to resort to CommonJS style requiring Node-fetch as opposed to importing.

const fetch = require('node-fetch');


This circumvents the entire issue about ES Modules altogether but could be an inconvenience for those who are determined or required to adopt ES6 syntax and features. It also flies in face of the industry-wide adoption of ES6 syntax for modern web development.
Making Use of .mjs Extension
A workaround brought along by Node.js involves changing your `.js` files, housing import statements, into `.mjs` files. This informs Node.js that it should parse the contained code as ES6 module syntax. In this respect, your previous `node-fetch` import will appear akin to:

import fetch from 'node-fetch';


Embedded within a `.mjs` file and will achieve flawless execution. 
Flagging Node.js for ES Modules
In instances where changing each Javascript file's extension feels inconvenient or is interpreted as too large of an undertaking, you also possess the option of conveying to Node.js that it should treat all `.js` files as ES modules—under the asset of a given project.
To accomplish this you essentially craft a package.json file within your project’s root directory (in the event one does not already exist) and incorporate a `"type": "module"` property.
While these resolutions might prove handy, developers must also consider that adopting ES Modules syntax entails a broader shift in how your entire codebase interacts with imports and exports, not limited to `node-fetch`.
As Douglas Crockford, a keen observer and architect of JavaScript once said: 
"The good thing about reinventing the wheel is that you can get a round one."
Often, overcoming these roadblocks is part and parcel of the progress we make in JavaScript development. [source]
See also
JavaScript
·11 min read
Change Url Without Page Refresh Next.Js
Exploring Alternatives to Improve ES Modules in Your Node.Fetch Functionality

When it comes to enhancing ES Modules in your Node.Fetch functionality, there's inevitably a discussion about the pervasive error - "Require() of ES Modules is not supported", that crops up when using the popular library Node-Fetch. 
The common reason why developers encounter this issue pivots on the interplay between CommonJS and ES Modules. Here's an analysis:

Node.js originally supported CommonJS modules. Accordingly, 'require' is utilized to import modules.
ES Modules - a relatively new introduction in JavaScript, uses 'import' to bring in modules. This is where the conflict arises with older libraries, like Node-Fetch which were designed keeping in mind, CommonJS support.

This then, further accentuates the need for improving ES Module handling within the Node.Fetch framework.
Worth considering here, some valid alternatives or solutions to rectify this error:
1. Unifying Import Syntax:

Instead of using 

const fetch = require('node-fetch')

, utilize 

import fetch from 'node-fetch'

. Although, be mindful that Node.js may necessitate the use of the .mjs file extension or setting "type": "module" in your package.json to permit ES module syntax.
2. Using createRequire:

Utilize the 'createRequire' function from 'module' class. Scott Hanselman's quote, "The only way to make the deadline—the only way to go fast—is to keep the code as clean as possible at all times," holds apt for the use-case. Clean, straightforward code often offers the best solutions. For instance:


import { createRequire } from 'module';
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);
const fetch = require('node-fetch');


This allows you to use 'require' inside an ES module, incrementally bridging the gap between the two formats.
3. Transpilation: Transpile your code using Babel or Typescript. In this way, at runtime, you're always using CommonJS, thereby, circumventing the issue.
4. Switching Libraries: Consider switching to a modern library with better ES Modules support such as Axios.
For further reading, I would recommend exploring Node.js ES Modules documentation or Node's documentation on 

import fetch from 'node-fetch';

(async () => {
   const fetch = (...args) => import('node-fetch').then(({default: fetch}) => fetch(...args));
   const response = await fetch('https://google.com');
   // ... 
})();

const fetch = require('node-fetch');